Shloka 6◆Names 17–18

Love's archway and the darting fish

ChantShloka 60:00 / 0:09
Speed
Ranjani – Gayatri

वदनस्मरमाङ्गल्यगृहतोरणचिल्लिका

vadanasmaramāṅgalyagṛhatoraṇacillikā

वक्त्रलक्ष्मीपरीवाहचलन्मीनाभलोचना

vaktralakṣmīparīvāhacalanmīnābhalocanā

Tap any word to inspect its meaning, grammar, and syllables.

Artha

Meaning

Both names in this verse turn her face into a place, and in both the place belongs to Kāma. In the first, her face is the house where Love's wedding is being held, and her two eyebrows are the festooned arch flung across its doorway — the toraṇa that is put up over the entrance for an auspicious occasion. In the second, the loveliness of that face brims over the way a full tank spills into its outlet channel, and her eyes move in the spill like fish in running water. Notice what the two names have in common: neither describes a feature, both describe a motion. An archway is a thing you pass under on the way in, and an overflow is water going somewhere. After the stillness of the previous verse, the face has begun to move.

Nāmāni

The names in this shloka(2)

  • 17vadanasmaramāṅgalyagṛhatoraṇacillikāWhose Brows Are Love's Archway
  • 18vaktralakṣmīparīvāhacalanmīnābhalocanāWhose Eyes Are Fish In Beauty's Stream

Itihāsa

History and background

A toraṇa is not an architectural arch in general. It is the decorated gateway raised over a doorway for a festival or a wedding, hung with mango leaves, flowers and cloth; the word carries the occasion with it. So the first name is not saying that her brows are curved like an arch. It is saying that her face is a wedding house, that the wedding is Love's, and that the brows are the garland strung over the door to announce it. This is a forward reference. Twelve names later the stotra will describe the marriage thread that Kāmeśvara has tied around her neck, using the same word — māṅgalya — that appears here in māṅgalya-gṛha. The wedding announced at the eyebrows is celebrated at the throat.

The second name is one of the most quietly technical images in the whole hymn. Parivāha, in the dictionary, is the overflow of a tank and the channel dug to carry the surplus away: the word belongs to irrigation, not to poetry. The picture is therefore precise. Her face is a reservoir that has filled past its lip; the beauty running out of it has cut a channel; and in that channel there are fish. Śaṅkara uses the same rare word in the same position in the Saundaryalaharī, describing the parting of her hair as the outlet-channel of the flood of her facial beauty, which makes this one of the closest verbal contacts between the two texts.

The fish matter. In Sanskrit poetry a beautiful woman's eyes are conventionally compared to fish, and the comparison is not merely about shape: it is about the flicker, the fact that a fish in shallow water is visible chiefly as a movement. But the fish is also Kāma's emblem — he is makara-dhvaja and mīna-ketana, the god whose banner carries the sea-creature — so the second name, like the first, has quietly put Love's insignia on her face. Two names, two pieces of Kāma's wedding equipment: his archway and his flag.

One word here deserves an honest warning. Cillikā, the word for eyebrow, is not in Monier-Williams with that meaning. The 1899 dictionary records cilli as a bird of prey and cillī as a pot-herb, and cillikā only as a variant of those. The sense "eyebrow" is what the commentators take, it is what the context demands, and it is recorded in later Sanskrit lexicons and in the modern Indo-Aryan languages; but a student working only from Monier-Williams will not find it, and would be entitled to be puzzled. This is worth knowing as a general caution. The sahasranāma draws on a vocabulary that is partly regional, partly late, and partly technical to its own tradition, and the great colonial dictionary does not cover all of it.

Sambandha

Related passages

Saundaryalaharī 47

भ्रुवौ भुग्ने किञ्चिद्भुवनभयभङ्गव्यसनिनि त्वदीये नेत्राभ्यां मधुकररुचिभ्यां धृतगुणम् । धनुर्मन्ये सव्येतरकरगृहीतं रतिपतेः प्रकोष्ठे मुष्टौ च स्थगयति निगूढान्तरमुमे ॥

bhruvau bhugne kiñcidbhuvanabhayabhaṅgavyasanini tvadīye netrābhyāṃ madhukararucibhyāṃ dhṛtaguṇam | dhanurmanye savyetarakaragṛhītaṃ ratipateḥ prakoṣṭhe muṣṭau ca sthagayati nigūḍhāntaramume ||

Umā, you whose one addiction is the breaking of the world's fear: your two eyebrows, slightly bent, strung with a cord that is your eyes with their sheen of black bees — I take them for the bow of Rati's lord, held in his left hand, with the space between them hidden by his wrist and his fist.

The same anatomy read as Kāma's equipment rather than as his wedding arch. Śaṅkara makes the two brows one bow, with the eyes as the drawn bowstring and the bridge of the nose as the archer's hand concealing the middle; the sahasranāma makes them the toraṇa over Love's door. Either way, the eyebrows belong to Kāma — which is the same point the stotra made in its second and third verses about her hands.

Saundaryalaharī 44

तनोतु क्षेमं नस्तव वदनसौन्दर्यलहरी-परीवाहः स्रोतःसरणिरिव सीमन्तसरणिः । वहन्ती सिन्दूरं प्रबलकबरीभारतिमिर-द्विषां बृन्दैर्बन्दीकृतमिव नवीनार्ककिरणम् ॥

tanotu kṣemaṃ nastava vadanasaundaryalaharī-parīvāhaḥ srotaḥsaraṇiriva sīmantasaraṇiḥ | vahantī sindūraṃ prabalakabarībhāratimira-dviṣāṃ bṛndairbandīkṛtamiva navīnārkakiraṇam ||

May the line of your parted hair bring us safety — that line which is like the runnel of a stream, the overflow-channel of the surging beauty of your face; and which carries vermilion in it like a beam of the new sun taken prisoner by the massed enemies of light, the thick darkness of your braided hair.

The same rare irrigation word, parīvāha, in the same construction: the overflow of the beauty of her face. Śaṅkara sends the overflow up into the parting of the hair and fills it with vermilion; the sahasranāma sends it sideways and puts fish in it. The shared vocabulary is close enough that the two texts are almost certainly drawing on a common stock of Śrīvidyā description.

Saundaryalaharī 56

तवापर्णे कर्णेजपनयनपैशुन्यचकिता निलीयन्ते तोये नियतमनिमेषाः शफरिकाः । इयं च श्रीर्बद्धच्छदपुटकवाटं कुवलयं जहाति प्रत्यूषे निशि च विघटय्य प्रविशति ॥

tavāparṇe karṇejapanayanapaiśunyacakitā nilīyante toye niyatamanimeṣāḥ śapharikāḥ | iyaṃ ca śrīrbaddhacchadapuṭakavāṭaṃ kuvalayaṃ jahāti pratyūṣe niśi ca vighaṭayya praviśati ||

Aparṇā, the little carp keep themselves hidden in the water, never blinking, terrified of the tale-bearing your eyes carry to your ears. And Beauty herself leaves the blue lotus at dawn, shutting its petals like a pair of doors behind her, and forces them open again to get back in at nightfall.

The fish of the second name, and the reason for them. Sanskrit poetry compares long eyes to carp; Śaṅkara turns the comparison round so that the real fish are frightened by the competition and go into hiding. Reading the two together tells you what the sahasranāma's calanmīnābhalocanā is compressing: not the shape of the eyes but their flicker, the way a fish shows itself only as a movement in the water.

Sādhanā

For practice

Both lines are single sixteen-syllable names again, and both are long chains of nouns with a single word at the end that turns the chain into a description of her. Read the first as vadana - smara - māṅgalya - gṛha - toraṇa - cillikā: face, Love, auspicious, house, arch, eyebrow. The order is the order of the thought, from the largest container to the smallest thing described, and if you hold that shape the sixteen syllables come easily.

The consonant to watch in the first line is the ṅg of māṅgalya, a guttural nasal followed by a voiced velar, with the tongue-body making both at the same place. Then ly in māṅgalya and gṛ in gṛha, which contains another syllabic ṛ. Cillikā has a doubled l — cil-li-kā — and the doubling must be heard, because the metre counts the first syllable heavy on the strength of it.

The second line is harder. Vaktra opens with the cluster kt, unvoiced velar into unvoiced dental, and then r: vak-tra, three consonants with only one vowel among them. Lakṣmī has the kṣ conjunct followed immediately by m, so the word is really lakṣ-mī and the ṣ must be audible. Calanmīnābha hides a sandhi: the present participle calat, moving, has had its final t assimilated to the m that follows, giving calan-mīna — another instance of the -at participle, the fourth in six verses. And locanā ends the line with three light, open syllables, which is why the whole thing lands softly after so much consonantal traffic.

One rhythmic point. Both of these names describe motion, and the metre cooperates. The first line is dominated by long vowels — mā, gṛ is short but tora and cilli give a settled, arch-like shape — while the second accelerates through vaktra-lakṣmī and only opens out at parīvāha. Chanting them at the same speed flattens something the poet built in.

For contemplation, the tradition takes the eyebrows seriously for a reason beyond ornament. The point between the brows is where the ājñā-cakra is located, and Śaṅkara's poem places Śiva there. Whether or not you take that up as a practice, the verse gives you somewhere definite to rest the attention while chanting: the arch above the door, and then the water going past.

Ādhāra

Sources and further study