Shloka 24◆Names 64–65
The court assembles in praise, and the army moves out
Tap any word to inspect it.
देवर्षिगणसङ्घातस्तूयमानात्मवैभवा
devarṣigaṇasaṅghātastūyamānātmavaibhavā
भण्डासुरवधोद्युक्तशक्तिसेनासमन्विता
bhaṇḍāsuravadhodyuktaśaktisenāsamanvitā
Tap any word to inspect its meaning, grammar, and syllables.
Artha
Meaning
Two names, each sixteen syllables long, each filling an entire line. Nothing in the preceding verses has been built on this scale, and the change of measure is the first signal that the hymn has changed genre. What has come before was description — her body, her city, her eyes. What begins here is narrative. The first name shows the assembly: massed companies of gods and seers, gathered and singing not her deeds but the greatness that is hers to begin with. The second shows what the assembly is for. She is surrounded by an army composed of her own powers, and that army has one purpose, named without euphemism in the middle of the compound: the killing of the demon Bhaṇḍa. The order matters. The praise comes first and the mobilisation second, so that the war is framed from the outset as something undertaken by a sovereign already acknowledged rather than as a contest whose outcome is open. Everything from here until the campaign is over will be told in names of this length.
Nāmāni
The names in this shloka(2)
- 64devarṣigaṇasaṅghātastūyamānātmavaibhavāWhose Glory Assembled Gods And Sages Praise
- 65bhaṇḍāsuravadhodyuktaśaktisenāsamanvitāAttended By The Army Of Śaktis
Itihāsa
History and background
Bhaṇḍāsura is the antagonist of the Lalitopākhyāna, the long narrative of Lalitā transmitted in the Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa, and this hymn sits inside that narrative. The story of his origin begins with the episode already invoked when her consort was named lord of desire. Śiva, disturbed in meditation, opened his third eye and burnt Kāma, the god of desire, to ash. The ash did not disperse. One of Śiva's attendants gathered it and shaped a figure from it; Śiva's glance fell on the figure and it came to life. The accounts explain the name from an exclamation of dismay uttered at the sight of the creature, though they differ over who uttered it, and the word bhaṇḍa in ordinary Sanskrit means a knave or a buffoon. The being performed austerities, obtained from Śiva the boon of taking half the strength of any adversary who faced him, built himself a capital called Śūnyaka — the empty city — and ruled.
What his rule did to the world is the part of the story that matters most for reading this hymn. Being made from the ashes of desire, Bhaṇḍa presided over a world from which desire had been withdrawn: nothing was begotten, nothing was wanted, and life went on without vitality. The tradition's point is exact and uncomfortable. The demon is not desire; the demon is what desire becomes when it is incinerated rather than governed. And the goddess who must destroy him has just been named, in the verse immediately preceding this one, as the one whose eyes hold desire and who gives people what they want. When the campaign ends, one of its results will be the restoration of Kāma to his body at the request of his widow.
Unable to endure the situation, the gods performed a great sacrifice, and from the sacrificial pit Lalitā arose — which is why the fourth name of this hymn calls her the one born from the fire-pit of consciousness. She was married to Kāmeśvara, established at Śrīpura, and went to war. Her forces are the śaktis, and śaktisenā is a phrase that works two ways, since śakti means both a power and, in ordinary usage, a spear. An army of powers is also an army of blades. The commanders are named later in the hymn: Mantriṇī, also called Śyāmalā, who is her minister, and Daṇḍanāthā, also called Vārāhī, who is her commander-in-chief, each with her own war-chariot, and Lalitā herself riding the chariot named for the Śrīcakra. The subsequent verses will bring in the fifteen Nityā goddesses, the young goddess Bālā who kills Bhaṇḍa's sons, and the production of Gaṇeśa to break an obstructing device the enemy deploys. The war is not incidental to the diagram: the goddesses who fight it are the same goddesses who inhabit the enclosures of the Śrīcakra, so that a practitioner performing the worship is moving through an order of battle.
The first name repays a slower reading than its length invites. Devarṣi may be taken as a dvandva, gods and sages, or as the technical term devarṣi, a divine sage, which is one of the recognised grades of seer alongside the royal sage and the brahmin sage — Nārada is the standard example. Gaṇa is a troop or company and saṅghāta is a compact mass, so the two together pile crowd on crowd; the compound is doing with vocabulary what a crowd scene does with paint. Stūyamāna is a present passive participle from the root stu, to praise, the same root that gives stotra, the word for the genre this text belongs to. What they are praising is her ātmavaibhava, her own magnificence — vaibhava being an abstract noun formed from vibhu, the all-pervading or mighty, and ātma- here carrying its common sense of "own" rather than its philosophical sense of self. The distinction is worth holding onto. They are not celebrating what she has done for them, which at this point in the story is nothing; they are acknowledging what she is.
One textual note. The nāmāvalī, the form of the text used for offering each name with the word of homage, transmits this name a syllable short, ending in -vaibhāyai rather than the -vaibhavāyai that the stotra's -vaibhavā requires. The shortened form is not a Sanskrit word, and it is best treated as a transmission error rather than a variant reading, but a reciter using a printed nāmāvalī may well find it there.
Sambandha
Related passages
अमी हि त्वां सुरसङ्घा विशन्ति केचिद्भीताः प्राञ्जलयो गृणन्ति । स्वस्तीत्युक्त्वा महर्षिसिद्धसङ्घाः स्तुवन्ति त्वां स्तुतिभिः पुष्कलाभिः ॥
amī hi tvāṃ surasaṅghā viśanti kecid bhītāḥ prāñjalayo gṛṇanti | svastīty uktvā maharṣisiddhasaṅghāḥ stuvanti tvāṃ stutibhiḥ puṣkalābhiḥ ||
These hosts of gods are entering you; some, frightened, praise you with palms joined. Crying out "may it be well", the companies of great seers and perfected ones praise you with abundant praises.
Almost the same words in almost the same arrangement — hosts of gods, companies of seers, and the root stu twice over. Arjuna is describing what he sees when the universal form opens, and the sahasranāma's first name describes the court at Śrīpura, but the scene is the same scene: the whole assembly of the divine order in the posture of praise before a power that does not need it. Reading them together shows how conventional the image is, which is worth knowing before deciding what is distinctive about this hymn.
या देवी सर्वभूतेषु शक्तिरूपेण संस्थिता । नमस्तस्यै नमस्तस्यै नमस्तस्यै नमो नमः ॥
yā devī sarvabhūteṣu śaktirūpeṇa saṃsthitā | namas tasyai namas tasyai namas tasyai namo namaḥ ||
The goddess who abides in all beings in the form of power — to her homage, to her homage, to her homage again and again.
One verse of a long litany in which the same frame is filled with a different word each time: consciousness, sleep, hunger, error, forgiveness, mercy. This is the śakti one, and it is the premise behind śaktisenā. An army composed of her powers is not a levy raised from outside; it is the same energy that constitutes every being, gathered and given direction. The triple repetition of the homage, incidentally, is why this litany is one of the most chanted passages in Śākta liturgy.
Sādhanā
For practice
Two names of sixteen syllables each, one to a line, with no internal landmarks to steer by. Compounds of this length are learned by finding the joints, drilling the pieces, and then joining them without a pause. The joints of the first are devarṣi, gaṇa, saṅghāta, stūyamāna, ātma, vaibhavā — gods-and-sages, troops, massed, being-praised, own, magnificence. Those of the second are bhaṇḍāsura, vadha, udyukta, śakti, senā, samanvitā — Bhaṇḍa, killing, roused-for, powers, army, accompanied-by. Six pieces each, none difficult alone.
Two of those joints involve vowel sandhi worth understanding rather than memorising. In the first name, stūyamāna ends in short a and ātma begins in long ā, and the two merge into one long ā: stūyamānātma. In the second, vadha ends in short a and udyukta begins in short u, and a plus u gives o: vadhodyukta.
The opening of the first name conceals a third sandhi. The elements are deva and ṛṣi, and ṛṣi begins with the vocalic ṛ; a preceding a combines with ṛ to give ar, which is why the word is devarṣi. The resulting cluster rṣi needs the tongue back for both sounds — the r a light tap, the ṣ with the tip curled to the roof of the mouth. It is not the rsh of English "harsh".
Saṅghāta gives the guttural nasal before an aspirated g. The ṅ is made at the soft palate, as in "sing", and the gh is a voiced stop with breath after it, not g plus a separate h. Immediately after comes stū, dental s into unaspirated dental t, so the mouth travels from the back of the palate to the teeth across two syllables; this is where reciters stumble. Then ātma, where tm is dental t straight into labial m.
The second name is dominated by clustered stops. Ṇḍ in bhaṇḍa is retroflex nasal into retroflex ḍ, tongue curled for both, and dy in udyukta is dental d into the palatal glide. Kt appears twice, in udyukta and śakti, both times guttural k released cleanly into dental t; the commonest error is to swallow the k. Nv is dental n into v.
The caesura falls after the sixteenth syllable, exactly the end of the first name, so the metrical break and the sense break coincide. Breathe there and nowhere else, which means each name must be carried on one breath.
For archanā both names take -āyai: devarṣigaṇasaṅghātastūyamānātmavaibhavāyai namaḥ, bhaṇḍāsuravadhodyuktaśaktisenāsamanvitāyai namaḥ. Printed nāmāvalīs differ over the first, some giving the shortened form that drops a syllable; follow the text your teacher uses, and treat the short form as defective rather than optional.
What the verse asks is a change of bearing. Until now the hymn has been contemplative and the natural way to chant it has been even and unhurried. From here it becomes a war narrative and the names lengthen accordingly, and the temptation is to accelerate into the story. The tradition's practice runs the other way: these are the longest names in the stotra, delivered at full weight, because the campaign they open is not a digression from the worship but the reason it exists.
Ādhāra
Sources and further study
- The Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa (Ancient Indian Tradition and Mythology series)tr. G. V. Tagare (Motilal Banarsidass, 1983–84)The Lalitopākhyāna here is the only place to read the Bhaṇḍāsura war at length, and everything the next dozen verses of the hymn allude to is narrated in it — the origin from Kāma's ashes, the city of Śūnyaka, the commanders, the chariots, the final weapon. It is long and repetitive, and worth reading anyway, because the hymn assumes you know it and will not stop to explain.
- Śiva: The Erotic AsceticWendy Doniger O'Flaherty (Oxford University Press, 1973)For the burning of Kāma, which is where Bhaṇḍa comes from. Doniger assembles the Purāṇic versions of the episode and shows how insistently the tradition returns to the problem of what happens to desire when an ascetic destroys it — a question the Lalitā story answers by making the ashes stand up and declare war.
- Devī-Māhātmya: The Crystallization of the Goddess TraditionThomas B. Coburn (Motilal Banarsidass, 1984)A close study of the earlier and more famous goddess-battle text, and useful here for comparison rather than for content. Coburn shows how the Devī Māhātmya assembles its goddess out of the gods' own powers before the fighting starts; the Lalitā narrative inherits that pattern, which is why her army is made of śaktis and not of allies.
- The Hindu Tantric World: An OverviewAndré Padoux (University of Chicago Press, 2017)The best short orientation to the tradition as a whole by a scholar who spent a career in its texts. Relevant here for its treatment of how pantheons are organised — why the goddesses who fight in the narrative turn out to be the same goddesses installed in the enclosures of the diagram, and what it means to worship a battle order.
- Lalitā-sahasranāma, with the Saubhāgyabhāskara of Bhāskararāyatr. R. Ananthakrishna Sastry (Adyar Library / Theosophical Publishing House)Most useful of all in this stretch of the hymn, because the war names are the ones a modern reader is least equipped to follow. The commentary supplies the episode behind each and, characteristically, often supplies more than one, which is the quickest way to learn that the narrative circulated in more than a single form.